Gallstone-related pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis

Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
gastro@uni-greifswald.de

Entry Version: 

Version 1.0, August 19, 2016

Citation: 

Lerch, Markus M. Aghdassi, Ali. (2016). Gallstone-related pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis.
Pancreapedia: Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base, DOI: 10.3998/panc.2016.24

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is now the most common reason for hospital admission among all gastrointestinal disorders. In most countries the presence of gallbladder stones represents the most frequent and significant risk factors for developing acute pancreatitis and underlying gallstone disease accounts for between 30 and 50% of cases with pancreatitis. The question via what mechanism gallstones trigger pancreatitis on their passage through the biliary tract is not purely academic. Considering what is known today about the onset mechanisms of the disease restoring impaired pancreatic secretion, rather than preventing the reflux of bile into the pancreatic duct, should become the primary therapeutic or preventive strategy.

1. Etiology and pathogenesis of pancreatitis

Acute Pancreatitis is an inflammatory disorder of the exocrine pancreas caused, in most cases, by immoderate alcohol consumption or the passage of gallstones. Population-based studies indicate that the incidence of acute pancreatitis is rising from 14.8 in 100,000 (1990-1994) to 31.2 in 100,000 (2010-2013) among British males (14). Acute pancreatitis is currently the most frequent reason for hospital admission among all non-malignant gastrointestinal diseases (38). It also remains a lethal disease with an overall mortality of 4.3% within 90 days and a one year mortality of 7.9% (14). Not only heavy alcohol consumption but also gallstone disease is becoming more common. Population-based studies indicate that the prevalence of gallstones in some western countries surpasses 20% of the adult population (45). While genetic predispositions clearly play an important part in gallstone formation (5, 46) they cannot explain the continuous rise in gallstone prevalence which is much more likely to be due to nutritional and life style factors. Once a patient has developed pancreatitis due to gallstones the disease is likely to recur if the source of migrating bile duct stones is not removed or their impaction at the duodenal papilla is not prevented.  In a study involving some 5,000 patients admitted for a first episode of acute gallstone-associated pancreatitis, endoscopic sphincterotomy reduced the recurrence rate from approximately 30% during the first weeks to 6.7 %, an elective interval cholecystectomy reduced it to 4.4 %, and performing endoscopic sphincterotomy during the same hospital admission combined with elective cholecystectomy reduced it further to 1.2 % (32). Another way to address the problem is the transient insertion of small plastic stent into the pancreatic duct. After manipulation of the papilla, e.g. to remove a gallstone or to perform a spincterotomy, the consequent swelling can obstruct the pancreatic duct, an event as we shall later see, that triggers pancreatitis in some patients. The inserted plastic stent prevents the prolonged impairment of pancreatic secretion and has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of ERCP-induced pancreatitis (9). Taken together these clinical and population-based observations indicate that a) carrying gallstones increases the risk of developing acute pancreatitis; b) only gallstones that are small enough to pass through the biliary tract, rather than the ones that remain asymptomatically in the gallbladder, confer a pancreatitis risk; c) strategies intended to remove the source of migrating gallstone or that prevent their impaction near the duodenal papilla reduce the risk of developing pancreatitis in the first place and the risk of a recurrence of pancreatitis; and d) preserving the flow from the pancreatic duct is an effective way of preventing ERCP-induced pancreatitis, a clinical entity considered to be caused by obstruction of the pancreatic duct.  The next paragraph will review the century old discussion about the underlying mechanism how a wandering gallstone initiates pancreatitis.

2. Possible mechanisms of gallstone-induced pancreatitis

A connection between gallbladder stones and pancreatitis has been suspected since at least the 17th century (12) but how gallstones confer that risk has been the matter of much debate. Claude Bernard discovered in 1856 (4) that bile is an agent that, when injected into the pancreatic duct of laboratory animals, can cause pancreatitis. Since that time many studies have been performed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. It is firmly established today that the initiation of pancreatitis requires the passage of a gallstone from the gallbladder through the biliary tract (1) and gallstones, that remain in the gallbladder will not cause pancreatitis. However, the various hypotheses that were proposed to explain this association have sometimes been contradictory. In 1901 Eugene Opie postulated that impairment of the pancreatic outflow due to obstruction of the pancreatic duct causes pancreatitis (36). This initial ’duct obstruction hypothesis’ was somewhat forgotten when Opie published his second ‘common channel’ hypothesis during the same year (35). This later hypothesis predicted that an impacted gallstone at the papilla of Vater creates a communication between the pancreatic and the bile duct (the so called ‘common channel’) through which bile flows into the pancreatic duct and thus causes pancreatitis (Figure 1).

Although Opie´s ‘common channel’ hypothesis seems rational from a mechanistic point of view and has become one of the most popular theories in the field, considerable experimental and clinical evidence is incompatible with its assumptions (23, 33). Anatomical studies have shown that the communication between the pancreatic duct and the common bile duct is much too short (< 6 mm) to permit biliary reflux into the pancreatic duct (8) and an impacted gallstone would most likely obstruct both, the common bile duct and the pancreatic duct (27). Even in the event of an existing anatomical communication pancreatic secretory pressure would still exceed biliary pressure and pancreatic juice would flow into the bile duct rather than bile into the pancreatic duct (6, 29). Late in the course of pancreatitis when necrosis is firmly established a biliopancreatic reflux due to a loss of barrier function in the damaged pancreatic duct may well explain the observation of a bile-stained necrotic pancreas at the time of surgery. This, however, should not be regarded as evidence for the assumption that reflux of bile into the pancreas is a triggering event for the disease onset. Experiments performed on the American opossum, an animal model that is anatomically well suited to test the common channel hypothesis, have revealed that neither a common channel, nor a biliopancreatic reflux is required for the development of acute necrotizing pancreatitis but obstruction of the pancreatic duct is required (23).


Figure 1: The two “Opie hypotheses” for the pathogenesis of gallstone induced pancreatitis, both reported in 1901. A: A gallstone on its passage through the biliary tract obstructs the pancreatic duct. The impaired flow from the exocrine pancreas triggers acinar cell or duct cell damage. Whether or not the common bile duct is also obstructed is immaterial to the triggering mechanism of pancreatitis in this scenario. B: A gallstone, impacted at the duodenal papilla, creates a communication between the pancreatic duct and the common bile duct. Behind it, bile can flow through this “common channel” into the pancreatic duct and would trigger the onset of acute pancreatitis. Modified from reference (19).

In order to overcome the inconsistencies of the ’common channel’ hypothesis it was proposed that the passage of a gallstone could damage the duodenal sphincter in a manner that sphincter insufficiency results. This, in turn, could permit duodenal content, including bile and activated pancreatic juice, to flow through the incompetent sphincter and into the pancreatitis duct (28) thus inducing pancreatitis. While this hypothesis would, indeed, avoid most of the inconsistencies of Opie’s ‘common channel’ hypothesis it was shown not to be applicable to the human situation in which sphincter stenosis, rather than sphincter insufficiency, results from the passage of a gallstone through the papilla and flow of pancreatic juice into the bile duct, rather than flow of duodenal content into the pancreas, is the consequence (15). A final argument against the ‘common channel’ hypothesis is that the perfusion of bile through the pancreatic duct has been shown to be completely harmless (41) and only a potential influx of infected bile, which might occur after prolonged obstruction at the papilla when the pressure gradient between the pancreatic duct (higher) and the bile duct (lower) is reversed (2, 7), may represent an aggravating factor, as opposed to an initiating event, for the course of pancreatitis.

Taken together these data suggest that the initial pathophysiological events during the course of gallstone-induced pancreatitis affect acinar cells (21) and are triggered, in accordance with Opie’s initial hypothesis, by obstruction or impairment of flow form the pancreatic duct (25). A reflux of bile into the pancreatic duct – either through a common channel created by an impacted gallstone or through an incompetent spincter caused by the passage of a gallstone – is neither required nor likely to occur during the initial course of acute pancreatitis (40).

3. Cellular events during pancreatic duct obstruction

To investigate the cellular events involved in gallstone-induced pancreatitis an animal model based on pancreatic duct obstruction in rodents has been employed (30). In addition to a morphological and biochemical characterization of this experimental disease variety the intracellular calcium release in response to hormonal stimuli was investigated. Under physiological resting conditions most cell types, including the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas, maintain a Ca2+-gradient across the plasma membrane with low intracellular (nanomolar range) facing high extracellular (millimolar range) Ca2+-concentrations. A rapid Ca2+-release from intracellular stores in response to external and internal stimuli is used by many of these cells as a signaling mechanism that regulates such diverse biological events as growth and proliferation, locomotion and contraction, and the regulated secretion of exportable proteins. An impaired cellular capacity to maintain the Ca2+-gradient across the plasma membrane has previously been identified as a common pathophysiological characteristic of vascular hypertension, malignant tumor growth, and cell damage in response to toxins. It has also been observed in a secretagogue-induced model of acute pancreatitis (31, 42) where a rapid and sustained rise of intracellular Ca2+ caused by release from apical stores and a rapid entry of extracellular Ca2+ has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of experimental pancreatitis. Up to 6 hours of pancreatic duct ligation in rats and mice, a condition that mimics the situation in human gallstone-induced pancreatitis, induced leukocytosis, hyperamylasemia, pancreatic edema and granulocyte immigration into the lungs, all of which were not observed in bile duct-ligated controls (30). It also led to significant intracellular activation of pancreatic proteases such as trypsin, an event we will discuss in the next paragraph in more detail. While the resting [Ca2+]i in isolated acini rose by 45% to 205±7 nM, the acetylcholine- and cholecystokinin-stimulated calcium peaks as well as amylase secretion declined. However, neither the [Ca2+]i signaling pattern nor the amylase output in response to the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin, nor the secretin-stimulated amylase release, were impaired by pancreatic duct ligation. On the single cell level pancreatic duct ligation reduced the percentage of cells in which a physiological secretagogue stimulation was followed by a physiological response (i.e. Ca2+-oscillations) and increased the percentage of cells with a pathological response (i.e. peak-plateau or absent Ca2+-signal). Moreover, it reduced the frequency and amplitude of Ca2+-oscillation as well as the capacitative Ca2+-influx in response to secretagogue stimulation.

To test whether these prominent changes in intra-acinar cell calcium signaling not only parallel pancreatic duct obstruction but are directly involved in the initiation of pancreatitis, animals were systemically treated with the intracellular calcium chelator BAPTA-AM. As a consequence, both the parameters of pancreatitis as well as the intrapancreatic trypsinogen activation induced by duct ligation, were found to be significantly reduced. These experiments suggest that pancreatic duct obstruction, the critical event involved in gallstone-induced pancreatitis, rapidly changes the physiological response of the exocrine pancreas to a pathological Ca2+-signaling pattern. This pathological Ca2+-signaling is associated with premature digestive enzyme activation and the onset of pancreatitis – both of which can be prevented by administration of an intracellular calcium chelator. A number of preclinical and ongoing clinical trials have employed the dependence of pancreatitis on intracellular calcium signaling and have identified Mg2+ as a suitable calcium antagonist in this context (31, 42) in which a calcium chelator would be too toxic and have proceeded to test its efficiency in patients (11).

Whether or not premature intra-acinar cell protease activation provides a sufficient explanation for triggering pancreatitis has recently come under discussion and covered elsewhere in this volume as well as in recent reviews (20).

4. Cellular signaling and sorting mechanisms

Subsequent investigations have focused on the cellular signaling and sorting mechanisms involved in the disease onset. Essential events that have been identified are colocalization and transactivation of lysosomal cathepsins with zymogens and the above-mentioned pathological Ca2+-release from intracellular stores. Both processes were found to be of critical importance not only in supramaximal stimulation-induced models of pancreatitis (13, 18) but also in clinically more relevant duct obstruction-induced pancreatitis (16, 24).

Two inconsistencies of the duct-ligation models of pancreatitis have led to renewed interest in the role of bile in the disease onset. The first was that duct-ligation alone, with the notable exception of the opossum, induces mostly mild pancreatitis, rather than fully developed necrosis, particularly in the rat (30). The second inconsistency was that some studies employing the opossum model, while still refuting the common-channel-hypothesis, reported that bile duct-ligation, when added to pancreatic duct-ligation, increased the severity of the disease (43). This suggests that elevated bile acids in the systemic circulation could aggravate the disease process and the subsequent line of arguments has previously been summarized (19).

A first confirmation for this assumption came from studies reporting that bile acids have a direct effect on pancreatic acinar cells and elicit an oscillatory release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (47). This bile acid effect on [Ca2+]i is either mediated via bile acid inhibition of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump with consecutive depletion of ER Ca2+-stores and activation of significant capacitative Ca2+-entry into the cytosol (10, 17) or, alternatively, by potentiation of Ca2+-release from the ER and apical (vesicular) Ca2+ -stores (3, 47, 48). Most studies agree that monohydroxy-bile-acids, such as taurolithocholic-acid-3–sulfate (TLC-S) have a more potent effect on acinar cells than dihydroxy-bile-acids (i.e.TCDC) or trihydroxy-bile-acids and can cause damage independently of their properties as detergents or ionophores. Most importantly, TLC-S can induce pathological Ca2+-signals and lead to trypsinogen activation at concentrations that correspond to those found in the serum of patients with gallstone-induced biliary obstruction (48, 49). The disease-aggravating effect of common bile duct obstruction in pancreatitis would therefore not require bile reflux into the pancreatic duct but be elicited readily by bile acids in the serum or interstitial space of jaundiced patients.

The question remains as to how bile acids enter the acinar cell and whether this entry occurs from the basolateral or the luminal surface. An elegant study by Kim (17) identified two potential mechanisms (Figure 2): The first involves a Na+-dependent-co-transporter (Na+-taurocholate co-transporting-polypeptide, NTCP), that accounts for approximately 25% of the bile acid uptake and is predominantly operative at the luminal membrane.


Figure 2: Different cellular mechanisms that can all mediate the uptake of bile acids into either duct or acinar cells from either the luminal side of the cell or from the interstitial/vascular surface. Modified from reference (19).

Bile acid uptake via this transporter would thus require bile reflux to reach the pancreatic acinar cell via the duct. The other uptake mechanism involves an HCO3- -dependent exchanger (organic-anion-transporting polypeptide, OATP3) which operates from the basolateral acinar cell surface and could thus be supplied with serum or interstitial bile acids.

Perides and co-workers (39) have recently identified an additional mechanism for the effects of bile acid on pancreatic acinar cells which 1) seems to require action only at the luminal cell surface; 2) is independent of bile acid uptake mechanisms into the cell; and 3) involves G-protein-receptor-coupled signalling events elicited by TLC-S, which suggests biliary pancreatitis to be a surface-receptor-mediated disease. The authors used a mouse strain deleted for the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor-1 (Gpbar1) (44) and induced pancreatitis by injecting bile acids (50µl 3mM TLC-S or Na+-taurocholate) into the pancreatic duct which results in mild acute pancreatitis involving only the head of the pancreas and was not burdened with the high mortality of the established Na+-taurocholate-induced models of pancreatitis (50). Interestingly, only TLC-S injection resulted in pancreatitis in this setting whereas Na+-taurocholate did not. Gpbar1-/- mice were completely protected against TLC-S-induced pancreatitis. These studies have led to renewed interest in the events that take place inside the pancreatic duct during the initiating phase of gallstone induced pancreatitis. Some appear to involve impairment of pancreatic fluid secretion (26), others the intraductal action of prematurely activated trypsin (37), the action of intraductal lysosomal enzymes (16, 22), signal transduction events within ductal cells (39)or changes in the intraductal pH (34). While Eugene Opie challenged preconceived theories about the mechanisms that trigger gallstone-induced pancreatitis and has set us on path towards actionable results (such as restoring the flow of pancreatic juice or preventing its blockage) clinically relevant information is still accumulating at a rapid pace from laboratories the world over that hopefully results in better treatment and prevention strategies for this still deadly disease.

5. References

  1. Acosta JM and Ledesma CL. Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 290(9): 484-487,1974. PMID: 4810815.
  2. Arendt T,Nizze H,Monig H,Kloehn S,Stuber E and Folsch UR. Biliary pancreatic reflux-induced acute pancreatitis--myth or possibility? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(3): 329-335,1999. PMID: 10333208.
  3. Barrow SL,Voronina SG,da Silva Xavier G,Chvanov MA,Longbottom RE,Gerasimenko OV, et al. ATP depletion inhibits Ca2+ release, influx and extrusion in pancreatic acinar cells but not pathological Ca2+ responses induced by bile. Pflugers Arch 455(6): 1025-1039,2008. PMID: 17952455.
  4. Bernard C. Lecons de physiologie experimentale. Paris Bailliere 2: 758,1856.
  5. Buch S,Schafmayer C,Volzke H,Seeger M,Miquel JF,Sookoian SC, et al. Loci from a genome-wide analysis of bilirubin levels are associated with gallstone risk and composition. Gastroenterology 139(6): 1942-1951 e1942,2010. PMID: 20837016.
  6. Carr-Locke DL and Gregg JA. Endoscopic manometry of pancreatic and biliary sphincter zones in man. Basal results in healthy volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 26(1): 7-15,1981. PMID: 7460708.
  7. Csendes A,Sepulveda A,Burdiles P,Braghetto I,Bastias J,Schutte H, et al. Common bile duct pressure in patients with common bile duct stones with or without acute suppurative cholangitis. Arch Surg 123(6): 697-699,1988. PMID: 3369934.
  8. DiMagno EP,Shorter RG,Taylor WF and Go VL. Relationships between pancreaticobiliary ductal anatomy and pancreatic ductal and parenchymal histology. Cancer 49(2): 361-368,1982. PMID: 7032685.
  9. Fan JH,Qian JB,Wang YM,Shi RH and Zhao CJ. Updated meta-analysis of pancreatic stent placement in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 21(24): 7577-7583,2015. PMID: 26140006.
  10. Fischer L,Gukovskaya AS,Penninger JM,Mareninova OA,Friess H,Gukovsky I, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase facilitates bile acid-induced Ca2+ responses in pancreatic acinar cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292(3): G875-886,2007. PMID: 17158252.
  11. Fluhr G,Mayerle J,Weber E,Aghdassi A,Simon P,Gress T, et al. Pre-study protocol MagPEP: a multicentre randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulphate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol 13: 11,2013. PMID: 23320650.
  12. Grisellius H. Misc cur Med phys Acad etc. Ann III: 65,1681.
  13. Halangk W,Lerch MM,Brandt-Nedelev B,Roth W,Ruthenbuerger M,Reinheckel T, et al. Role of cathepsin B in intracellular trypsinogen activation and the onset of acute pancreatitis. J Clin Invest 106(6): 773-781,2000. PMID: 10995788.
  14. Hazra N and Gulliford M. Evaluating pancreatitis in primary care: a population-based cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 64(622): e295-301,2014. PMID: 24771844.
  15. Hernandez CA and Lerch MM. Sphincter stenosis and gallstone migration through the biliary tract. Lancet 341(8857): 1371-1373,1993. PMID: 8098791.
  16. Hirano T,Saluja A,Ramarao P,Lerch MM,Saluja M and Steer ML. Apical secretion of lysosomal enzymes in rabbit pancreas occurs via a secretagogue regulated pathway and is increased after pancreatic duct obstruction. J Clin Invest 87(3): 865-869,1991. PMID: 1705567.
  17. Kim JY,Kim KH,Lee JA,Namkung W,Sun AQ,Ananthanarayanan M, et al. Transporter-mediated bile acid uptake causes Ca2+-dependent cell death in rat pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology 122(7): 1941-1953,2002. PMID: 12055600.
  18. Kruger B,Albrecht E and Lerch MM. The role of intracellular calcium signaling in premature protease activation and the onset of pancreatitis. Am J Pathol 157(1): 43-50,2000. PMID: 10880374.
  19. Lerch MM and Aghdassi AA. The role of bile acids in gallstone-induced pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 138(2): 429-433,2010. PMID: 20034603.
  20. Lerch MM and Gorelick FS. Models of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 144(6): 1180-1193,2013. PMID: 23622127.
  21. Lerch MM,Saluja AK,Dawra R,Ramarao P,Saluja M and Steer ML. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the opossum: earliest morphological changes involve acinar cells. Gastroenterology 103(1): 205-213,1992. PMID: 1612327.
  22. Lerch MM,Saluja AK,Dawra R,Saluja M and Steer ML. The effect of chloroquine administration on two experimental models of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 104(6): 1768-1779,1993. PMID: 8500736.
  23. Lerch MM,Saluja AK,Runzi M,Dawra R,Saluja M and Steer ML. Pancreatic duct obstruction triggers acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the opossum. Gastroenterology 104(3): 853-861,1993. PMID: 7680018.
  24. Lerch MM,Saluja AK,Runzi M,Dawra R and Steer ML. Luminal endocytosis and intracellular targeting by acinar cells during early biliary pancreatitis in the opossum. J Clin Invest 95(5): 2222-2231,1995. PMID: 7537759.
  25. Lerch MM,Weidenbach H,Hernandez CA,Preclik G and Adler G. Pancreatic outflow obstruction as the critical event for human gall stone induced pancreatitis. Gut 35(10): 1501-1503,1994. PMID: 7959214.
  26. Maleth J,Balazs A,Pallagi P,Balla Z,Kui B,Katona M, et al. Alcohol disrupts levels and function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator to promote development of pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 148(2): 427-439 e416,2015. PMID: 25447846.
  27. Mann FC and Giordano AS. The bile factor in pancreatitis. Arch Surg 6: 1-30,1923.
  28. McCutcheon AD. Reflux of Duodenal Contents in the Pathogenesis of Pancreatitis. Gut 5: 260-265,1964. PMID: 14178712.
  29. Menguy RB,Hallenbeck GA,Bollman JL and Grindlay JH. Intraductal pressures and sphincteric resistance in canine pancreatic and biliary ducts after various stimuli. Surg Gynecol Obstet 106(3): 306-320,1958. PMID: 13519371.
  30. Mooren F,Hlouschek V,Finkes T,Turi S,Weber IA,Singh J, et al. Early changes in pancreatic acinar cell calcium signaling after pancreatic duct obstruction. J Biol Chem 278(11): 9361-9369,2003. PMID: 12522141.
  31. Mooren FC,Turi S,Gunzel D,Schlue WR,Domschke W,Singh J, et al. Calcium-magnesium interactions in pancreatic acinar cells. FASEB J 15(3): 659-672,2001. PMID: 11259384.
  32. Mustafa A,Begaj I,Deakin M,Durkin D,Corless DJ,Wilson R, et al. Long-term effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of gallstone pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 28(1): 127-133,2014. PMID: 23982647.
  33. Neoptolemos JP. The theory of 'persisting' common bile duct stones in severe gallstone pancreatitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 71(5): 326-331,1989. PMID: 2802482.
  34. Noble MD,Romac J,Vigna SR and Liddle RA. A pH-sensitive, neurogenic pathway mediates disease severity in a model of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 57(11): 1566-1571,2008. PMID: 18625695.
  35. Opie E. The etiology of acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. John Hopkins Hosp Bull 12: 182-188,1901.
  36. Opie E. The relation of cholelithiasis to disease of the pancreas and to fat necrosis. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 12: 19-21,1901.
  37. Pallagi P,Venglovecz V,Rakonczay Z, Jr.,Borka K,Korompay A,Ozsvari B, et al. Trypsin reduces pancreatic ductal bicarbonate secretion by inhibiting CFTR Cl- channels and luminal anion exchangers. Gastroenterology 141(6): 2228-2239, 2011. PMID: 21893120.
  38. Peery AF,Dellon ES,Lund J,Crockett SD,McGowan CE,Bulsiewicz WJ, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5): 1179-1187 e1171-1173,2012. PMID: 22885331.
  39. Perides G,Laukkarinen JM,Vassileva G and Steer ML. Biliary acute pancreatitis in mice is mediated by the G-protein-coupled cell surface bile acid receptor Gpbar1. Gastroenterology 138(2): 715-725,2010. PMID: 19900448.
  40. Pohle T,Konturek JW,Domschke W and Lerch MM. Spontaneous flow of bile through the human pancreatic duct in the absence of pancreatitis: nature's human experiment. Endoscopy 35(12): 1072-1075,2003. PMID: 14648423.
  41. Robinson TM and Dunphy JE. Continuous perfusion of bile and protease activators through the pancreas. JAMA 183: 530-533,1963. PMID: 13974478.
  42. Schick V,Scheiber JA,Mooren FC,Turi S,Ceyhan GO,Schnekenburger J, et al. Effect of magnesium supplementation and depletion on the onset and course of acute experimental pancreatitis. Gut 63(9): 1469-1480,2014. PMID: 24277728.
  43. Senninger N,Moody FG,Coelho JC and Van Buren DH. The role of biliary obstruction in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis in the opossum. Surgery 99(6): 688-693,1986. PMID: 2424109.
  44. Vassileva G,Golovko A,Markowitz L,Abbondanzo SJ,Zeng M,Yang S, et al. Targeted deletion of Gpbar1 protects mice from cholesterol gallstone formation. Biochem J 398(3): 423-430,2006. PMID: 16724960.
  45. Volzke H,Baumeister SE,Alte D,Hoffmann W,Schwahn C,Simon P, et al. Independent risk factors for gallstone formation in a region with high cholelithiasis prevalence. Digestion 71(2): 97-105,2005. PMID: 15775677.
  46. von Kampen O,Buch S,Nothnagel M,Azocar L,Molina H,Brosch M, et al. Genetic and functional identification of the likely causative variant for cholesterol gallstone disease at the ABCG5/8 lithogenic locus. Hepatology 57(6): 2407-2417,2013. PMID: 22898925.
  47. Voronina S,Longbottom R,Sutton R,Petersen OH and Tepikin A. Bile acids induce calcium signals in mouse pancreatic acinar cells: implications for bile-induced pancreatic pathology. J Physiol 540(Pt 1): 49-55,2002. PMID: 11927668.
  48. Voronina SG,Barrow SL,Gerasimenko OV,Petersen OH and Tepikin AV. Effects of secretagogues and bile acids on mitochondrial membrane potential of pancreatic acinar cells: comparison of different modes of evaluating DeltaPsim. J Biol Chem 279(26): 27327-27338,2004. PMID: 15084611.
  49. Voronina SG,Gryshchenko OV,Gerasimenko OV,Green AK,Petersen OH and Tepikin AV. Bile acids induce a cationic current, depolarizing pancreatic acinar cells and increasing the intracellular Na+ concentration. J Biol Chem 280(3): 1764-1770,2005. PMID: 15536077.
  50. Wartmann T,Mayerle J,Kahne T,Sahin-Toth M,Ruthenburger M,Matthias R, et al. Cathepsin L inactivates human trypsinogen, whereas cathepsin L-deletion reduces the severity of pancreatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 138(2): 726-737,2010. PMID: 19900452.