Revision of Pancreatic Inflammation and Carcinogenesis from Mon, 2017-01-23 14:30

S. Arthur Localio Laboratory, Departments of Surgery and Cell Biology New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016

Entry Version: 

Version 1.0, February 9, 2015


Zambirinis, Constantinos P. Miller, George. (2015). Pancreatic Inflammation and Carcinogenesis.
Pancreapedia: Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base, DOI: 10.3998/panc.2015.6

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents the quintessential example of an inflammation-driven cancer. This is supported by epidemiological data as well as evidence from preclinical models and clinical studies. In this brief review we discuss the recent advances pertaining to the link between inflammation and pancreatic cancer, and present our perspective on this topic.

Inflammation is relevant both as a risk factor for and as a consequence of oncogenesis in pancreatic cancer. In terms of risk of pancreatic carcinogenesis, patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis carry a 13-fold higher risk of PDAC development (45). Further, patients with hereditary autoimmune pancreatitis have an estimated lifetime risk for PDAC development of 40% (2). The duration of pancreatitis appears to correlate positively with the possibility of Kras mutations (29), which suggests a possible mutagenic role for repetitive bouts of inflammation. Nevertheless, the majority of PDAC cases develop in the absence of clinically evident overt pancreatitis (46). One can hence conclude that either subclinical, low-grade inflammation is sufficient to promote carcinogenesis, or that inflammation is a consequence of the earliest events in the stepwise process of pancreatic carcinogenesis. This low-grade inflammation that is a result of cellular stress and malfunction has been termed “parainflammation” and is hypothesized to either contribute to cellular adaptation to the noxious environment or to promote senescence in order to prevent malignant transformation (31).

Critical work done on genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMMs) in the past decade recapitulates the sequence of events occurring in human PDAC (30). Kras is mutated in more than 90% of human PDAC cases and constitutive activation within the pancreas results in PDAC development in mice in a fashion very similar to its human counterpart (12, 23). There appears to be a cooperative relationship between Kras activation and inflammation (1, 34). Specifically, Ptf1aCre/+;LSL-KrasG12D/+ (“KC”) mice, which have mutant Kras expressed prenatally in all exocrine pancreatic lineages, exhibit pancreatitis as one of the earliest morphologic changes in their pancreas. In addition, treatment of these mice with only a few doses of caerulein – a cholecystokinin analog that hyperstimulates the pancreas and induces pancreatitis if injected repeatedly – dramatically accelerates the progression to advanced PanINs and invasive cancer within a few weeks (compared to months in untreated mice) (5). 

A seminal discovery was made by Guerra et al, who used a Cre / Tet-off system to activate the Kras mutation in acinar cells of adult mice. Surprisingly, these mice only developed pancreatic cancer when chronic pancreatitis was induced with caerulein, suggesting that Kras mutation alone – in absence of pancreatitis – is insufficient to induce pancreatic cancer in adulthood (22). The same group has shown that chronic pancreatitis enables Kras-driven carcinogenesis by thwarting oncogene-induced senescence – a homeostatic mechanism that diverts stressed cells prone to malignant transformation towards cell cycle arrest and quiescence (21). Concurrent treatment of the mice with a COX1/2 inhibitor not only prevented the progression of early PanINs to advanced PanINs and invasive cancer but also decreased the number of early PanINs, pointing to additional mechanisms through which inflammation promotes pancreatic carcinogenesis (21).

Logsdon and colleagues have studied the role of inflammation and its influence on Kras-driven carcinogenesis from a different perspective. They showed that even when Kras is mutated and constitutively active, it cannot reach the expected theoretical levels of activity and remains at levels close to the basal state (25). However, inflammatory insults such as caerulein and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can hyperstimulate Kras, bringing its activity above the hypothetical threshold necessary for the initiation of the sequence of carcinogenesis (9, 25). Furthermore, constitutive activation of both Kras and either IKK2 (an activator of the NF-κB pathway) or COX2 (a downstream effector of the NF-κB pathway) in acinar cells dramatically accelerates carcinogenesis (9). Conversely, ablation of IKK2 mitigated the caerulein-induced inflammation and fibrosis, decreased the levels of active Kras, and protected against PanIN formation (9). Similar results were observed with inhibition of COX2 (9). Additional evidence was provided by another study which showed that mutant Kras induces the transcription of IL-1α through AP-1. IL-1α in turn activates the NF-κB pathway leading to production of more IL-1α as well as activation of the signaling adaptor p62 which prolongs the activity of this pathway (27). A very intriguing finding was that, in the context of chronic pancreatitis and tissue injury, Kras mutation can give rise to PDAC originating from insulin-positive endocrine cells (20). The significance of this lies in the fact that chronic inflammation can induce de-differentiation of committed epithelial cells and thence promote carcinogenesis. In summary, inflammation synergizes with Kras through the establishment of a positive feedback loop that is dependent on NF-κB and COX2 and leads to sustained Kras activity; on the other hand, Kras activity promotes an IL-1α- and p62-mediated feed-forward loop that sustains NF-κB pathway activity.

Several other mechanisms contributing to inflammation-driven carcinogenesis in PDAC have been identified to date. A notable example is STAT3, which appears to be a central mediator in pancreatic carcinogenesis. STAT3 is activated in mice challenged with caerulein. In WT mice, the activation status reverts to baseline after a few days consistent with recovery from acute pancreatitis. By contrast, in KC mice STAT3 remains persistently activated (19). This is a consequence of communication between the epithelial cells and the surrounding stromal cells. Specifically, the Kras-mutant epithelial cells recruit myeloid cells which secrete IL-6 and activate the STAT3 pathway in the epithelial cells via IL-6 trans-signaling, thus completing a positive feedback loop (26). Persistent STAT3 activation drives pancreatic cancer progression through upregulation of anti-apoptotic and pro-proliferative proteins such as Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Survivin, c-Myc and Cyclin D1 (19, 26, 47). In incipient carcinogenesis, this may be critical for the evasion of oncogene-induced senescence, while later on it may be more important for proliferation under the adverse conditions of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Moreover, STAT3 activation in epithelial cells promotes the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators which further recruit leukocytes; at the same time, epithelial STAT3 signaling induces the expression of MMP7 which supports tumor growth and metastasis (19). Genetic ablation of IL-6 or STAT3 , neutralization of IL-6 trans-signaling, as well as deletion of STAT3 exclusively in the epithelial cells dampens tumor-associated inflammation and protects from spontaneous and  caerulein-induced PanIN formation and PDAC development (19, 26).

The tumor microenvironment in the pancreas is rife with factors that can attract inflammatory cells and entrain them to support the process of carcinogenesis and shield the cancer cells from the anti-tumorigenic arm of the immune system. Kras-mutant epithelial cells secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to recruit myeloid cells that suppress CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (3, 35). The secretion of GM-CSF begins early on, and its neutralization depletes myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enables efficient tumor killing by CD8+ T cells (3, 35). In a similar fashion, pancreatic cancer cells produce the chemokine CCL2 that mobilizes inflammatory monocytes from the bone marrow and recruits them to the pancreas as well as to premetastatic niches such as the liver to promote tumor growth and metastasis, respectively (37). Cancer cells also secrete CCL5 and other ligands that recruit regulatory T cells (Treg) in a CCR5-dependent manner and thus contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (43).

Macrophages are the predominant immune cell type in the pancreas during pancreatitis, and promote de-differentiation and delayed pancreas regeneration after caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis (17). They infiltrate the pancreas early in the course of pancreatic carcinogenesis, and localize around pre-neoplastic ducts (7). Liou et al showed that macrophages directly act on nearby epithelial cells to promote acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) – the earliest pre-malignant lesion observed during sustained pancreatic inflammation (28). This ADM-promoting effect was contingent upon several macrophage-derived soluble mediators, especially TNF-α and CCL5/RANTES, which act through NF-κB to promote epithelial cell proliferation and MMP9-mediated remodeling of the extracellular matrix (28). Notably, depletion of macrophages significantly decreased the formation of ADM foci in mice undergoing caerulein-induced pancreatitis.

Manipulation of tumor-associated macrophages using an agonistic anti-CD40 antibody has been shown to have beneficial effects both in mice and in humans, by causing them to switch from a pro-inflammatory phenotype characterized by low MHC II expression and secretion of IL-10, TNF-α, and IL-6, to an anti-tumorigenic phenotype featuring upregulation of MHC II and CD86, elevated serum IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels, enhanced tymor lytic capacity, and involution of tumor stroma and associated fibrosis (4). Notably, the anti-tumorigenic effects of CD40-primed macrophages were independent of CD4 and CD8 T cells (4).

Cancer cells can also influence the immune response indirectly by manipulating other stromal cells. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) – which in pancreatic cancer may originate from pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) – are induced to express an NF-κB-dependent pro-inflammatory gene signature that enhances tumor growth, vascularization and macrophage recruitment (15). Additionally, inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β and TNF-α released by the cancer cells instruct CAFs to release thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), which in turn signals to myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) to skew CD4+ T cells towards TH2 polarization (10). TH2-deviated CD4+ T cells have a pro-carcinogenic role in the pancreas through the perpetuation of pancreatic fibro-inflammation and the recruitment of M2 macrophages (10, 11). Further, activated PSCs upregulate adhesion molecules and secrete chemokines – the most prominent being CXCL12 – that sequester CD8+ T cells around them and prevent them from attacking the cancer cells (14). Another study validated these results and further showed that fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-expressing CAFs secreting CXCL12 are the limiting factor for the efficacy of T cell checkpoint inhibitors (16). Inhibition of CXCL12 reverses the immunosuppressive effects of PSC/CAFs and synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy leading tumor elimination (14, 16).

Contrary to the above, two recent studies showed conflicting data regarding the role of CAFs in pancreatic cancer. Özdemir et al used the Ptf1aCre/+;LSL-KrasG12D/+;Tgfrb2fl/fl  mouse model (PKT) and crossed it with αSMA-tk transgenic mice to selectively deplete α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive myofibroblasts upon ganciclovir administration (48). Surprisingly, myofibroblast depletion early and late during the life of these mice led to less differentiated tumors and significantly decreased the survival of these mice. Similar findings were observed in KPC;αSMA-tk mice, suggesting that α-SMA+ myofibroblasts are protective, contrary to the notion that desmoplasia is detrimental for PDAC. Further, low α-SMA immunostaining in human PDAC specimens correlated with worse survival. From a mechanistic point of view, the authors showed that depletion of myofibroblasts led to suppression of angiogenesis, enhanced tumor hypoxia, promoted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell-like phenotype, reduced type I collagen content, altered the ECM organization, and decreased stiffness and elastic modulus of tumors in PKT mice. Moreover, myofibroblast-depleted tumors exhibited decreased overall immune cell infiltration but an increased percentage of Tregs and higher expression of CTLA-4. Administration of anti-CTLA-4 antibody rescued the phenotype of myofibroblast-depleted tumors in PKT mice, improved overall survival, and led to a transcriptional profile that resembled that of control non-depleted tumors. Interestingly, the number of FAP+ cells was not affected in the above depletion model, suggesting that heterogeneity may exist among CAFs, and raising questions on whether the aforementioned results are attributable to selective depletion of subsets of CAFs that have tumor-protective effects.

In the second study, Rhim, Oberstein, Thomas et al employed the PKCY (a modification of the KPC mouse model harboring a YFP reporter) and by negating paracrine Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling through genetic deletion or pharmacologic inhibition, they achieved significant attenuation of the stromal component of the tumors (36). This depletion of the tumor stroma led to decreased infiltration of leukocytes, enhanced tumor cell proliferation, augmented EMT signature, accelerated formation of premalignant  lesions, more undifferentiated tumors, and increased metastasis, similarly to Özdemir et al. However, SHH ablation resulted in increased angiogenesis, in contrast to the former study. Moreover, in the context of deficient SHH signaling, anti-VEGFR2 blocking antibodies significantly improved survival.

Instead of using a stroma-depleting strategy, Sherman et al adopted a different approach for CAF manipulation (39). By comparing quiescent, activated, and cancer-associated PSCs using massively parallel RN sequencing, they found that the latter two express high levels of the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR). Activation of VDR with the agonist calcipotriol during caerulein-induced acute and chronic pancreatitis resulted in reversal of the PSC phenotype to the quiescent state, leading to attenuated inflammation and fibrosis, as well as lower phospho-STAT3 levels. When administered in vivo to KPC mice, calcipotriol had no measuarable beneficial effects. however, combined with gemcitabine chemotherapy, VDR agonization led to markedly increased intratumoral gemcitabine levels, decreased tumor size, and significantly prolonged overall survival, compared to gemcitabine alone.

Considering that inflammation is present very early in the stepwise process of pancreatic carcinogenesis, it is reasonable to assume that it would be an attractive target for chemoprevention. Indeed, multiple approaches have been adopted using either natural compounds with diverse effects or synthetic compounds that have specific targets (41). For example, inhibition of cyclooxygenases has been investigated in multiple studies using both non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin, nimesulide, etodolac, sulindac etc) and COX2-specific inhibitors (e.g. celecoxib) (8, 41). Several of those have been associated with decreased risk of pancreatic cancer (8, 41). Curcumin – an agent with pleiotropic effects on the tumor stroma and the associated inflammation – also seems to have a protective effect in pancreatic carcinogenesis (8). In light of the aforementioned study by Sherman et al, VDR agonists may also represent an attractive mode of chemoprevention, which has already been suggested by previous studies. For example, in two cohort studies with long-term follow-up, Skinner et al found that higher intakes of vitamin D were associated with lower risks for pancreatic cancer (40). Prospective studies in larger cohorts are required to address the efficacy of such compounds in preventing pancreatic cancer.

Innate immune receptors have an emerging role in driving inflammation within the pancreatic tumor microenvironement. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) represent the best described family of pattern-recognition receptors. They are present on most types of immune cells and they bind a variety of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs, such as LPS) as well as byproducts of dying cells and sterile inflammation denoted DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns) (42). Upon ligand binding, they recruit either the MyD88 or the TRIF adaptor molecules (depending on the specific TLR) to transduce activation signals to the NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Recent reports showed that TLR4 and TLR7 are upregulated within the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer (32, 33). Further, TLR activation can fuel pancreatitis and can synergize with Kras to dramatically accelerate pancreatic carcinogenesis in mice (9, 13, 32, 33, 38). These pro-carcinogenic effects of TLRs can be prevented through inhibition of either NF-κB or MAPK pathway (33). Furthermore, mice deficient in several TLRs are protected from acute pancreatitis and direct inhibition of TLR4 as well as TLR7 protects KC mice from pancreatic carcinogenesis (32, 33).

Other pattern recognition receptors and associated signaling molecules have been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammation-driven cancer. Nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat containing molecules or NOD-like receptors (NLRs) are cytoplasmic pattern-recognition receptors. When engaged by their ligands, they can activate the NF-κB pathway but they also associate with other molecules to form large oligomeric complexes called inflammasomes (18). Caspase-1 is a key component of activated inflammasomes and is responsible for the proteolytic cleavage and maturation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 (18). NLRs and their downstream effectors are necessary for keeping the intestinal microbiota under control. For example, mice deficient in several NLRs, Caspase-1, or IL-18 exhibit alterations in the gut microbiome and dysbiosis, and are highly susceptible to colorectal carcinogenesis (6). Consistent with their pro-inflammatory role, the inflammasomes have been found to contribute to the pathogenesis of pancreatitis (24, 44). Specifically, administration of a NOD1 agonist synergized with caerulein in the induction of acute pancreatitis (44). This was a result of NOD1 activation in acinar cells, which promoted acinar NF-κB and STAT3 signaling, and CCL2-mediated recruitment of CCR2+ pro-inflammatory cells (44). Furthermore, genetic ablation of NOD1, Nlrp3, Caspase-1, or ASC (another component of the inflammasome) protects from caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis (24, 44). However, a definitive role for NOD1, Nlrp3, Caspase-1, or ASC in pancreatic carcinoma is still investigational.

In summary, pancreatic dysplasia arises in the context of inflammation (Figure 1) and is driven toward carcinogenesis by a network of pro-inflammatory signaling mechanisms mediated by the interaction of an array of immune competent cells in the tumor microenvironment – including T cells subsets, M1 and M2 macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, neutrophils, and inflammatory monocytes – with each other and with the genetically at-risk epithelial and acinar compartments. Therapeutic targeting of inflammation and strategies to upwardly modulate adaptive immunity hold promise for the prevention of pancreatic carcinoma in at-risk individuals as well as for the treatment of established carcinoma in combination with approaches which directly address the genetically transformed cells.

Figure 1. Interplay between tumor-associated inflammation and pancreatic carcinogenesisPancreatic cancer progresses through a series of defined stages that involve acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) in response to repetitive injury, development of pre-neoplastic lesions, and eventually invasive cancer. Pancreatitis can be caused by genetic and environmental factors (e.g. alcohol), and can promote pancreatic carcinogenesis by inducing ADM while inhibiting oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). Noxious stimuli to the pancreas result in a low-grade maladaptive inflammatory response termed “parainflammation” that can synergize with mutant Kras in tumor development and evasion of OIS, and recruit immune cells that promote cancer-associated inflammation. Environmental factors, such as antibiotics and alcohol consumption, as well as pancreatitis can cause derangement of the gut microbiome and compromise the intestinal barrier function to promote translocation of bacteria to the pancreas. Translocated dysbiotic bacteria (pathobionts) can stimulate pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) and inflammasomes, perpetuating tumor-associated inflammation. Tumor-associated inflammation is further exacerbated by activation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways including STAT3, NF-κB, COX2. In parallel, tumor-associated immune suppression is exerted by a variety of cellular subsets including regulatory T-cells (Tregs), T-helper (Th2) cells, myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs).


  1. Ancrile, B.B., O'Hayer, K.M. & Counter, C.M. Oncogenic ras-induced expression of cytokines: a new target of anti-cancer therapeutics. Molecular interventions 8: 22-27, 2008. PMID: 18332481
  2. Bartsch, D.K., Gress, T.M. & Langer, P. Familial pancreatic cancer--current knowledge. Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology 9: 445-453, 2012. PMID: 22664588
  3. Bayne L.J., Beatty G.L., Jhala N., Clark C.E., Rhim A.D., Stanger B.Z. & Vonderheide R.H. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor regulates myeloid inflammation and T cell immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 21: 822-835, 2012. PMID: 22698406
  4. Beatty G.L., Chiorean E.G., Fishman M.P., Saboury B., Teitelbaum U.R., Sun W., Huhn R.D., Song W., Li D., Sharp L.L., Torigian D.A., O'Dwyer P.J. & Vonderheide R.H. CD40 agonists alter tumor stroma and show efficacy against pancreatic carcinoma in mice and humans. Science 331: 1612-1616, 2011. PMID: 21436454
  5. Carriere, C., Young, A.L., Gunn, J.R., Longnecker, D.S. & Korc, M. Acute pancreatitis markedly accelerates pancreatic cancer progression in mice expressing oncogenic Kras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382: 561-565, 2009. PMID: 19292977
  6. Chen, G.Y. & Nunez, G. Inflammasomes in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Gastroenterology 141: 1986-1999, 2011. PMID: 22005480
  7. Clark C.E., Hingorani S.R., Mick R., Combs C., Tuveson D.A. & Vonderheide R.H. Dynamics of the immune reaction to pancreatic cancer from inception to invasion. Cancer Res 67: 9518-9527, 2007. PMID: 17909062
  8. Cui X.J., He Q., Zhang J.M., Fan H.J., Wen Z.F. & Qin Y.R. High-dose aspirin consumption contributes to decreased risk for pancreatic cancer in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas 43: 135-140, 2014. PMID: 24263109
  9. Daniluk J., Liu Y., Deng D., Chu J., Huang H., Gaiser S., Cruz-Monserrate Z., Wang H., Ji B. & Logsdon C.D. An NF-kappaB pathway-mediated positive feedback loop amplifies Ras activity to pathological levels in mice. J Clin Invest 122: 1519-1528, 2012. PMID: 22406536
  10. De Monte L., Reni M., Tassi E., Clavenna D., Papa I., Recalde H., Braga M., Di Carlo V., Doglioni C. & Protti M.P. Intratumor T helper type 2 cell infiltrate correlates with cancer-associated fibroblast thymic stromal lymphopoietin production and reduced survival in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med 208: 469-478, 2011. PMID: 21339327
  11. Demols A., Le Moine O., Desalle F., Quertinmont E., Van Laethem J.L. & Devière J. CD4(+ )T cells play an important role in acute experimental pancreatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 118: 582-590, 2000. PMID: 10702210
  12. di Magliano, M.P. & Logsdon, C.D. Roles for KRAS in pancreatic tumor development and progression. Gastroenterology 144: 1220-1229, 2013. PMID: 23622131
  13. Ding, S.P., Li, J.C. & Jin, C. A mouse model of severe acute pancreatitis induced with caerulein and lipopolysaccharide. World J Gastroenterol 9: 584-589, 2003. PMID: 12632523
  14. Ene-Obong A., Clear A.J., Watt J., Wang J., Fatah R., Riches J.C., Marshall J.F., Chin-Aleong J., Chelala C., Gribben J.G., Ramsay A.G. & Kocher H.M. Activated pancreatic stellate cells sequester CD8+ T cells to reduce their infiltration of the juxtatumoral compartment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 145: 1121-1132, 2013. PMID: 23891972
  15. Erez, N., Truitt, M., Olson, P., Arron, S.T. & Hanahan, D. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Are Activated in Incipient Neoplasia to Orchestrate Tumor-Promoting Inflammation in an NF-kappaB-Dependent Manner. Cancer Cell 17: 135-147, 2010. PMID: 20138012
  16. Feig C., Jones J.O., Kraman M., Wells R.J., Deonarine A., Chan D.S., Connell C.M., Roberts E.W., Zhao Q., Caballero O.L., Teichmann S.A., Janowitz T., Jodrell D.I., Tuveson D.A. & Fearon D.T. Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 20212-20217, 2013. PMID: 24277834
  17. Folias, A.E., Penaranda, C., Su, A.L., Bluestone, J.A. & Hebrok, M. Aberrant innate immune activation following tissue injury impairs pancreatic regeneration. PLoS One 9: e102125, 2014. PMID: 25010227
  18. Franchi, L., Munoz-Planillo, R. & Nunez, G. Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nature immunology 13: 325-332, 2012. PMID: 2243078
  19. Fukuda A., Wang S.C., Morris J.P., Folias A.E., Liou A., Kim G.E., Akira S., Boucher K.M., Firpo M.A., Mulvihill S.J. & Hebrok M. Stat3 and MMP7 contribute to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma initiation and progression. Cancer Cell 19: 441-455, 2011. PMID: 21481787
  20. Gidekel Friedlander S.Y., Chu G.C., Snyder E.L., Girnius N., Dibelius G., Crowley D., Vasile E., DePinho R.A. & Jacks T. Context-dependent transformation of adult pancreatic cells by oncogenic K-Ras. Cancer Cell 16: 379-389, 2009. PMID: 19878870
  21. Guerra, C., Collado M., Navas C., Schuhmacher A.J., Hernández-Porras I., Cañamero M., Rodriguez-Justo M., Serrano M. & Barbacid M. Pancreatitis-induced inflammation contributes to pancreatic cancer by inhibiting oncogene-induced senescence. Cancer Cell 19: 728-739, 2011. PMID: 21665147
  22. Guerra, C., Schuhmacher A.J., Cañamero M., Grippo P.J., Verdaguer L., Pérez-Gallego L., Dubus P., Sandgren EP. & Barbacid M. Chronic pancreatitis is essential for induction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by K-Ras oncogenes in adult mice. Cancer Cell 11: 291-302, 2007. PMID: 17349585
  23. Hingorani, S.R., Petricoin E.F., Maitra A., Rajapakse V., King C., Jacobetz M.A., Ross S., Conrads T.P., Veenstra T.D., Hitt B.A., Kawaguchi Y., Johann D., Liotta L.A., Crawford H.C., Putt M.E., Jacks T., Wright C.V., Hruban R.H., Lowy A.M. & Tuveson D.A. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4: 437-450, 2003. PMID: 14706336
  24. Hoque R., Sohail M., Malik A., Sarwar S., Luo Y., Shah A., Barrat F., Flavell R., Gorelick F., Husain S. & Mehal W. TLR9 and the NLRP3 inflammasome link acinar cell death with inflammation in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 141: 358-369, 2011. PMID: 21439959
  25. Huang H., Daniluk J., Liu Y., Chu J., Li Z., Ji B. & Logsdon C.D. Oncogenic K-Ras requires activation for enhanced activity. Oncogene 33: 532-535, 2014. PMID: 23334325
  26. Lesina M., Kurkowski M.U., Ludes K., Rose-John S., Treiber M., Klöppel G., Yoshimura A., Reindl W., Sipos B., Akira S., Schmid R.M. & Algül H. Stat3/Socs3 activation by IL-6 transsignaling promotes progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and development of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 19: 456-469, 2011. PMID: 21481788
  27. Ling J., Kang Y., Zhao R., Xia Q., Lee D.F., Chang Z., Li J., Peng B., Fleming J.B., Wang H., Liu J., Lemischka I.R., Hung M.C. & Chiao P.J. KrasG12D-induced IKK2/beta/NF-kappaB activation by IL-1alpha and p62 feedforward loops is required for development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 21: 105-120, 2012. PMID: 22264792
  28. Liou G.Y., Döppler H., Necela B., Krishna M., Crawford H.C., Raimondo M. & Storz P. Macrophage-secreted cytokines drive pancreatic acinar-to-ductal metaplasia through NF-kappaB and MMPs. The J Cell Biol 202: 563-577, 2013. PMID: 23918941
  29. Lohr, M., Kloppel, G., Maisonneuve, P., Lowenfels, A.B. & Luttges, J. Frequency of K-ras mutations in pancreatic intraductal neoplasias associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Neoplasia 7: 17-23, 2005. PMID: 15720814
  30. Mazur, P.K. & Siveke, J.T. Genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic cancer: unravelling tumour biology and progressing translational oncology. Gut 61: 1488-1500, 2012. PMID: 21873467
  31. Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 454: 428-435, 2008. PMID: 18650913
  32. Ochi A., Graffeo C.S., Zambirinis C.P., Rehman A., Hackman M., Fallon N., Barilla R.M., Henning J.R., Jamal M., Rao R., Greco S., Deutsch M., Medina-Zea M.V., Bin Saeed U., Ego-Osuala M.O., Hajdu C. & Miller G. Toll-like receptor 7 regulates pancreatic carcinogenesis in mice and humans. J Clin Invest 122: 4118-4129, 2012. PMID: 23023703
  33. Ochi A., Nguyen A.H., Bedrosian A.S., Mushlin H.M., Zarbakhsh S., Barilla R., Zambirinis C.P., Fallon N.C., Rehman A., Pylayeva-Gupta Y., Badar S., Hajdu C.H., Frey A.B., Bar-Sagi D. & Miller G. MyD88 inhibition amplifies dendritic cell capacity to promote pancreatic carcinogenesis via Th2 cells. J Exp Med 209: 1671-1687, 2012. PMID: 22908323
  34. Özdemir B.C., Pentcheva-Hoang T., Carstens J.L., Zheng X., Wu C.C., Simpson T.R., Laklai H., Sugimoto H., Kahlert C., Novitskiy S.V., De Jesus-Acosta A., Sharma P., Heidari P., Mahmood U., Chin L., Moses H.L., Weaver V.M., Maitra A., Allison J.P., LeBleu V.S. & Kalluri R. Depletion of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis induces immunosuppression and accelerates pancreas cancer with reduced survival. Cancer Cell 25: 719-734, 2014. PMID: 24856586
  35. Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., Grabocka, E. & Bar-Sagi, D. RAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 761-774, 2011. PMID: 21993244
  36. Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., Lee, K.E., Hajdu, C.H., Miller, G. & Bar-Sagi, D. Oncogenic Kras-induced GM-CSF production promotes the development of pancreatic neoplasia. Cancer Cell 21: 836-847, 2012. PMID: 22698407
  37. Rhim A.D., Oberstein P.E., Thomas D.H., Mirek E.T., Palermo C.F., Sastra S.A., Dekleva E.N., Saunders T., Becerra C.P., Tattersall I.W., Westphalen C.B., Kitajewski J., Fernandez-Barrena M.G., Fernandez-Zapico M.E., Iacobuzio-Donahue C., Olive K.P. & Stanger B.Z. Stromal elements act to restrain, rather than support, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 25: 735-747, 2014. PMID: 24856585
  38. Sanford D.E., Belt B.A., Panni R.Z., Mayer A., Deshpande A.D., Carpenter D., Mitchem J.B., Plambeck-Suess S.M., Worley L.A., Goetz B.D., Wang-Gillam A., Eberlein T.J., Denardo D.G., Goedegebuure S.P. & Linehan D.C. Inflammatory monocyte mobilization decreases patient survival in pancreatic cancer: a role for targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 19: 3404-3415, 2013. PMID: 23653148
  39. Sharif R., Dawra R., Wasiluk K., Phillips P., Dudeja V., Kurt-Jones E., Finberg R. & Saluja A. Impact of toll-like receptor 4 on the severity of acute pancreatitis and pancreatitis-associated lung injury in mice. Gut 58: 813-819, 2009. PMID: 19201771
  40. Sherman M.H., Yu R.T., Engle D.D., Ding N., Atkins A.R., Tiriac H., Collisson E.A., Connor F., Van Dyke T., Kozlov S., Martin P., Tseng T.W., Dawson D.W., Donahue T.R., Masamune A., Shimosegawa T., Apte M.V., Wilson J.S., Ng B., Lau S.L., Gunton J.E., Wahl G.M., Hunter T., Drebin J.A., O'Dwyer P.J., Liddle C., Tuveson D.A., Downes M. & Evans R.M. Vitamin d receptor-mediated stromal reprogramming suppresses pancreatitis and enhances pancreatic cancer therapy. Cell 159: 80-93, 2014. PMID: 25259922
  41. Skinner H.G., Michaud D.S., Giovannucci E., Willett W.C., Colditz G.A. & Fuchs C.S. Vitamin D intake and the risk for pancreatic cancer in two cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 1688-1695, 2006. PMID: 16985031
  42. Stan, S.D., Singh, S.V. & Brand, R.E. Chemoprevention strategies for pancreatic cancer. Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology 7: 347-356, 2010. PMID: 20440279
  43. Takeuchi, O. & Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140: 805-820, 2010. PMID: 20303872
  44. Tan M.C., Goedegebuure P.S., Belt B.A., Flaherty B., Sankpal N., Gillanders W.E., Eberlein T.J., Hsieh C.S. & Linehan D.C. Disruption of CCR5-dependent homing of regulatory T cells inhibits tumor growth in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. J Immunol 182: 1746-1755, 2009. PMID: 19155524
  45. Tsuji Y., Watanabe T., Kudo M., Arai H., Strober W. & Chiba T. Sensing of commensal organisms by the intracellular sensor NOD1 mediates experimental pancreatitis. Immunity 37: 326-338 2012. PMID: 22902233
  46. Yadav, D. & Lowenfels, A.B. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 144:1252-1261, 2013. PMID: 23622135
  47. Yeo, T.P. & Lowenfels, A.B. Demographics and epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. Cancer journal 18: 477-484, 2012. PMID: 23187833
  48. Yu, H., Pardoll, D. & Jove, R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nature reviews. Cancer 9: 798-809, 2009. PMID: 19851315